![]() If you're an artist who draws every day, definitely go for Photoshop. Whereas, GIMP shows some issues for the configuration. So basically, stick with GIMP if you want to be cheap, and are not planning on using it extensively. Apart from the OS support, compared to the GIMP, Krita provides better support for drawing the tablets. But one thing is for sure it speeds up my work flow tremendously. ![]() I've had a lot of people watch my streams where I'm drawing tilesets, and they are amazed and/or confused by what I'm doing, since they've never seen that certain option or tool being used in that way. Of course you probably won't ever touch those layer styles if you're not into logos/text and graphic design in general. The layer styles are also plentiful in Photoshop, which is lacking in GIMP, and I use them extensively. The warp option for example, is not included in GIMP (they have a tool called the warp tool, which is the equivalent of the liquefy tool in Photoshop, but not the same thing), and it's very useful for quick short cuts. But once you get used to all of the options in Photoshop and add them to your workflow, it'll go by soooo much easier. Which ever program you're used to will suit you the most, of course. GIMP has nothing to do with printing, and neither does Photoshop.Īs for the discussion, I can't give an accurate opinion, since I've only ever tried out GIMP once. The printing industry favours vector programs, which means it uses Adobe Illustrator for its printing needs, not Photoshop. Time will be the ultimate teacher here.Ĭlick to expand.That's incorrect. So far though, Gimp is very on par (for RPG Maker) with Photoshop. This will teach me Photoshop.Īs for printing. Has anyone tried this with sprites? I want to leave them chibi but with more realism. The sprites look cartoony, but wouldn't they pop with added realism. To me it feels like I can make my edits so much better, and I am going to play around with this, and try to make RTP character mods, from pixel art to a much more realistic set, still based on RTP. For those with no money, Gimp is hands down, the best out there. If I had to pay 400 bucks for this, I wouldn't. Photoshop uses smaller icons for their tools, which makes it harder to use though. The UI in single window mode in Gimp is about the same. I edited a couple of photos and like the image scaling better in Photoshop. Told him I already used Gimp and there was no reason to upgrade. He needed new struts on his car and I talked him down from $100. So I just got Photoshop CS6 Extended for about $75.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |